Detail:
This book break down the 24 hours up to and including 25th October 2015 into 11 chapters.
- The Ridge - the rival armies come into view 14:00 to 16:00 24th October 1415
- No Way Out: The Rival Commanders 16:00 to 20:00
- The Mud Bath: The Armies 20.00 to 24.00
- Well met by Moonlight: Battle Tactics, 24.00 to 06.00
- Breakfast at Agincourt: Motivation and Morale, 06.00 to 08.00
- A Touch of Harry in the Morning: Battle Ritual 08.00 to 09.00
- The Field of Battle: Terrain 09.00 to 11.00
- Banners Advance: The Armies Close In 11.00 to 11.30
- Impact: the Melee, 11.30 to 12.00
- Bowmen of England: The Rout 12.00 to 13.30
- A band of Brothers: The Victory 13.30 to 14.00
I'd already read Juliet Barker's Agincourt - which I loved and gives a strong analysis if the leadership qualities of Henry V plus the battle. With this I was looking for much more detail. I was nearly disappointed
Really?
As I settled into the book I became a little disgruntled. Michael Jones develops this habit of adding a great deal of background information. Mention of a character will almost inevitably lead to several paragraphs providing their history. It can be useful, but gets irritating when it happens to much, which it does. This is made worse by repetition, repeatedly.So I found myself ploughing through the book, but to finish it as much as enjoy it.
Turning Point
That was until we got to the battle itself. Michael Jones has thought long and hard about how it was fought. Exactly how. On the face of it Agincourt looks like a boring wargame, a guaranteed massacre of the French with little maneuver or jeopardy. This book throws that out of the window.
Jone's sets out a very thoughtful comparison of the hunting habits in medieval England and how Henry V and Edward, Duke of York organised, mobilised and motivated their exhausted army. He argues that they tapped into ways of behaving which were second nature to the men, using the hunt to help their forces understand their role and just how to behave.
He also introduces some solid thinking on how stakes were used by the archers, how Henry spread his forces in ways I'd not come across before and how he worked harder than simply waiting for the French to blunder into the arrow storm. The hand to hand fighting is also described in useful detail.
I won't say more, I don't want to spoil it for you.
Triumph.
This book is fab. It's changed how I think about the battle, indeed it helps you think differently about pretty much any battle. It makes you want to game it. Buy it, borrow it, read it.
I was unimpressed.
ReplyDeleteThe author also has some unusual ideas about the tactics employed by Henry. He suggests that the battle plan at Agincourt was based on the rituals of the hunt. There is even an appendix dedicated to the subject. The idea is that Henry goaded the French into attacking his line by the use of “hunting rituals”. This is partly centred on an interpretation of Erpingham’s cry that started the battle. The author claims that this was in fact a “hunting call”, “menee stroke”, whereas it is much more likely that Erpingham actually cried “Now strike” but in a broad Norfolk accent that French listeners would have found difficult to understand (hence the confusion about the meaning). Quite why Erpingham giving a hunting call would encourage the French to place themselves in the role of the deer in a hunt escapes me. Equally, if this was such a clever idea, how come no other medieval commander before or since did something similar? Try as I might I cannot accept this hypothesis as being anything more than mere conjecture.
I agree it's conjecture, but it really is interesting.
ReplyDelete